NCSF on Twitter   Subscribe to the NCSF RSS Feed   NCSF Blog

Media Update - September 7, 2008

1. Is North Huntingdon 'church' really disguised sex club?
2. Code enforcement: "Swingers club" in Tampa stays open for now
3. Town officials issue summonses to new adult club
4. Swinging Vegas entrepreneur to get his day in court
5. 1st cruise for swingers to launch

National Coalition for Sexual Freedom -- Media Update
September 7, 2008
www.ncsfreedom.org
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


1. Is North Huntingdon 'church' really disguised sex club?
2. Code enforcement: "Swingers club" in Tampa stays open for now
3. Town officials issue summonses to new adult club
4. Swinging Vegas entrepreneur to get his day in court
5. 1st cruise for swingers to launch



NCSF Media Updates represent a sampling of recent stories printed in US
newspapers, magazines, and selected websites containing significant
mention of SM-leather-fetish, polyamory, or swing issues and topics.

These stories may be positive, negative, accurate, inaccurate - or
anywhere in between.

NCSF publishes the Updates to provide readers a comprehensive look at what
media outlets are writing about these topics. NCSF permits and encourages
readers to forward these Updates where appropriate.



Is North Huntingdon 'church' really disguised sex club?
by Norm Vargo
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
September 4, 2008

Has Swingers Palace, an alleged sex club, been operating out of a
residence in North Huntingdon for the past seven years?

That possibility surfaced Tuesday at a hearing of the township zoning
board to consider an appeal of the Rev. John Ondrik and his wife, Kim, for
a special exception to an ordinance to allow them to operate a church out
of a residence at 4500 Turner Valley Road.

Chairman Theodore Wawrzyniak said the board will consider the nearly four
hours of sworn testimony by residents, township Commissioner Richard Gray,
Solicitor Bruce Dice, zoning officer Keith Evers and the Rev. Ondrik.

"A decision to deny or approve the request by the Ondriks will be
announced during the Oct. 7 meeting," Mr. Wawrzyniak said.

Rev. Ondrik, of Fredericktown, Washington County, says he is an ordained
minister of the nondenominational adults-only Church of Spiritual
Humanities, which serves "the People," not God.

Followers must be at least 21 years old to participate in the weekly
service that starts at midnight on Saturdays.

Attorney Samuel S. Pangborn, who represents the couple, says his clients
entered into a lease-to-purchase agreement with owner John M. Walkmeyer
Jr. in February 2001.

On July 16, Mr. Evers cited Mr. Walkmeyer, who resides in the Penns Woods
development, for operating a business out of a residence, a violation of a
township ordinance.

That action came after township officials learned about a Web site
advertisement for Swinger's Palace, owned by "John and Kim" and operating
at the Turner Valley Road address.

"The Web site listed charges of $75 per couple and $50 per single person.
No charge for single women," said township Planning Director Andy Blenko.

"A follow-up investigation by Mr. Evers found the house is not occupied,
but determined that some activity was taking place over weekends. The
investigation determined a business was being run out of the residence. On
July 16, the township notified Mr. Walkmeyer by certified letter that he
was in violation of a township ordinance."

"Rev. Ondrik and his wife did not defend their operation as a church until
after the township sent the letter," he said.

Among 10 exhibits submitted by Mr. Dice was a photo of the Ondriks in
almost transparent undergarments and an ad with a small face shot that, he
said, resembled Rev. Ondrik. The exhibits were copied from the Internet,
Mr. Dice told the board.

"The little picture is not me. These days, you can do wonders with a
computer," Rev. Ondrik said. "The other photo is our wedding picture. It
was taken in Jamaica.

"I'm not operating a sex club. Kim and I maintain a low profile. People
are just scared of us."

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08248/909087-59.stm
To respond, go to:
http://biz.post-gazette.com/contact/comments_form.aspx?ID=40


Code enforcement: "Swingers club" in Tampa stays open for now
by Tamara Hill
WTSP TV (Tampa Bay, FL)
September 3, 2008

A hearing today to determine whether the Pleasure Palace is in violation
of Hillsborough County's ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses
has been postponed. The next hearing is scheduled for October 2nd.

Under the law, an adult entertainment business and its employees must have
licenses to remain open, but county code enforcement says Pleasure Palace
does not. Some code enforcement officials call the business, "a sexual
encounter" and a "swingers club."

The hearing that was set for today was to decide whether the business is
illegal and needs to be shut down. For now, it will remain open.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.tampabays10.com/news/watercooler/story.aspx?storyid=88854&catid=58
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


Town officials issue summonses to new adult club
by Carolyn James
The Amityville Record (NY)
September 3, 2008

Babylon Town officials issued numerous summonses to the owners of the
Zodiac Lounge in West Babylon last week after they learned that the owners
were operating a ba hot new swingersb and bondage club there. Two weeks
ago, the owners, Felice and Dora Rubino, advertised that they were
offering bLong Island's only fetish and BDSM Clubb night every Thursday,
offering bon premises play, multiple mistresses to satisfy any submissive
desires and Guest Mistresses every week.b

The Club is located at 760 Sunrise Highway, just hundreds of yards from
residential homes, said Town officials. It violates local codes and
ordinances that require that adult-use facilities not be within 1,000 feet
of residential properties.

Tickets were issued to the Rubinos and the Zodiac Lounge Thurs., Aug. 28
for failing to have a proper public assembly permit, and using the
premises in opposition to the permitted use and approved plans. Additional
summonses are expected to be written later this week, said a Town
spokesman.

According to the Lounge's website and email messages sent last week, the
club opened Thurs., Aug. 21 and is open every Thursday night. It includes
a fully-equipped dungeon play area, dance floor and play and friendly
interaction is encouraged.b Patrons are asked to park in a bdiscreet
entrance.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.amityvillerecord.com/news/2008/0827/Front_page/00001.html
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


Swinging Vegas entrepreneur to get his day in court
by Joe Schoenmann
The Las Vegas Sun (NV)
September 3, 2008

The courts are going to get a chance to settle the question of whether sex
clubs should be legal in Las Vegas.

At the very least, a judge will be asked to determine whether 39-year-old
swinger David Cooper is right when he says Clark County is out to get him.
The county rejected Cooper's business license application a few months ago
after county investigators said he was operating before he had a license
and had lie on his application.

Cooper and his attorney, Lisa Rasmussen, appealed to the Clark County
Commission on Tuesday, arguing that at least four other swingers clubs
operate in the complex where Cooper had set up Sextasy's Commercial
Center, the oldest mall in Las Vegas, just west of the Maryland
Parkway-East Sahara Avenue intersection.

While arguing against the investigators' findings, Rasmussen made it clear
she thinks Cooper's constitutional rights were violated.

It's an equal protection under the law, 14th Amendment violation, when
all of these other businesses do the same thing,b Rasmussen said.

Deputy District Attorney Rob Warhola responded that bwe do not have to go
after all businesses at once. We can go after them one at a time.

Rasmussen and Cooper vowed to take the matter to court. The overarching
issue, Rasmussen said, is whether sex clubs are legal here.

If the county comes in and shuts down all of the clubs, then the next
issue is the (sex club) ordinance itself,b she said. It's vague and
overbroad and it won't stand up to constitutional scrutiny facially or as
applied.b

A sex club is defined by the county as ban establishment which provides
patrons the opportunity to voluntarily engage in and/or view live
consensual sexual activity and which collects remuneration of any kind,
including entrance fees, facility use fees, gratuities, fees for goods
provided far in excess of their value, and/or donations.b

Hotels could be included in that definition, Rasmussen argued.

Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani, whose district includes the Green Door,
has told the Sun that other swingers clubs have been able to keep their
business licenses because the county has yet to catch them bin the act.b

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/sep/03/swinging-vegas-entrepreneur-get-his-day-court/
To respond, write to: the author at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or the
editors at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


1st cruise for swingers to launch
by Paul Makishima
The Boston Globe (MA)
September 2, 2008

Think "Swingtown" meets "The Love Boat.''

YOLO Cruises, a Florida start-up, is set to launch its first cruise for
swingers April 26.

The seven-day voyage, aboard a chartered Carnival Cruise ship, will depart
from Tampa and head toward the Western Caribbean with port calls in Grand
Cayman, Cozumel, Belize and Roatan, Honduras.

Lest you have visions of orgiastic bacchanals sprawled across the Lido
Deck (what would Captain Steubing say?), there are rules to the road.
Nudity will be restricted to pool, spa tub areas, and special themed
parties. Similarly, Acts of Oneness (or twoness or eightness) must be
remain in staterooms or designated "playrooms.'' PDAs are OK; Public
Displays of the Other Kind are discouraged.

"It's not just about sex,'' says Marlene Brustle, president of YOLO, which
stands for You Only Live Once. "We know that some people will just want to
watch.''

Brustle says that this cruise will mark the world's first exclusively for
swingers. YOLO hopes to book 2,000 passengers for the voyage and is
shooting to do three to four a year.

Prices range from $949 for an inside cabin to $3,499 for a penthouse
suite.

Brustle, a 23-year veteran of the travel industry, says she was approached
to start the business by a major investment company, which she declined to
name. She said that the firm had done market research and found that there
was a niche for this kind of business.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.boston.com/travel/blog/2008/09/1st_cruise_for.html
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or comment at the
bottom of the page



HOW TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Feedback letters are an effective way to convey a positive image of
alternate sexual practices such as SM, swinging, or polyamory. You can
help to correct negative social myths and misconceptions about these types
of practices. These letters help achieve the advocacy goals of the NCSF.

Generally, for a letter to be published, it's important to include your
name (or first initial, last name), city and daytime phone (for
verification only). For more information, see:
https://ncsfreedom.org/media/writelettertoeditor.htm

Please alert us to positive, negative or neutral stories about SM,
swinging and polyamory at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Comments to the editor of
this Update may be sent to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

###

A project of NCSF and The Foundation of NCSF
 

SM Related Legal Research Resources

SM Related Legal Research Resources

  • Conducting SM Related Legal Research

    It is extremely important for members of NCSF constituent communities to understand the laws that may affect us.  Overview The law is interpreted – sometimes to our favor, and sometimes not. For example, while the NCSF firmly believes that consensual SM activity between adults is legal, there are those that have a differing opinion and will intentionally interpret the law in an unfavorable way. Therefore, it is extremely important for the SM-Leather-Fetish communities to have an understanding of the laws that may affect us. Knowing relevant laws will greatly assist our communities in safely organizing and maintaining SM-Leather-Fetish activities and functions. There are numerous laws, ordinances, and regulations at all levels of government - federal, state, regional, county and city. It's not easy to locate all of the laws that may affect us, but it's very important. You should make every attempt to thoroughly research your laws if your activities may come under the scrutiny of law enforcement or local authorities. In addition, NCSF recommends that thorough legal research should include consultation with a knowledgeable…






    Tags: Legal Legal Education
Jovanovic Case (Consent)

Jovanovic Case (Consent)

  • Affidavit of Susan Wright in Response to Affirmation in opposition to motion to file

    Affidavit of Susan Wright in Response to Affirmation in Opposition to Motion to File a Memorandum of Law Amicus Curiae   N.Y. Co. Ind. No 10938/96 Cal. No. 98-10474   1. I, Susan Wright, am the Executive Director of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) .   2. I write this affidavit in response to the DA's Brief in Opposition to the NCSF request to file an Amicus Curia…






    Tags: Legal Case Curiae
  • Affirmation of Michael Thomas Fois in response to opposition to motion to file

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96 -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X   AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS IN RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO MOTION TO FILE A MEMORANDUM OF LAW AMICUS CURIA Michael Thomas Fois, an attorney admitted to practice in front of this Court, affirms and…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Affirmation in opposition to motion to file

    AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FILE A -against- MEMORANDUM OF LAW   AMICUS CURIAE   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------------------ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Respondent, AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FILE A -against- MEMORANDUM OF LAW AMICUS CURIAE OLIVER JOVANOVIC, N.Y. Co. Ind. No. 10938/96 Defendant-Appellant. Cal. No. 98-10474 ------------------------------------------------------   MARK DWYER, an attorney duly…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Memorandum of Law of Amicus Curiae, NCSF

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF AMICUS CURIAE  NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM  SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------XTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96-against- OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X  MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF AMICUS CURIAE  NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT   This brief is filed by the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom ("NCSF") as amicus curiae. Defendant Oliver Jovanovic…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Affirmation of Michael Thomas Fois

    AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96   -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x       AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS     Michael Thomas Fois, an attorney admitted to practice in front of this Court, affirms and states under penalty of perjury,…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Notice of motion requesting leave to file memorandum of Law as Amicus Curiae

    NOTICE OF MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS AMICUS CURIAE   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/ -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X   NOTICE OF MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS AMICUS CURIAE   Please take notice that, Upon the annexed Affirmation of Michael…






    Tags: Legal Case
Barbara Nitke Case (CDA)

Barbara Nitke Case (CDA)

  • CDA Expert Testimony in the Barbara Nitke Case

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X BARBARA NITKE, THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM, and THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, -against- JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Defendants. 01 Civ. 11476 (RMB) PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------X   Plaintiffs Barbara Nitke ("Nitke") and…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA
  • Justices Reject Photographer's Appeal

    The Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal yesterday from a New York photographer who said that a federal decency law violated her First Amendment rights to post explicit pictures of sadomasochism and bondage on the Web, The Associated Press reported. The justices affirmed a decision by a special three-judge federal panel upholding the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which made it a crime to post obscene materials on the…






    Tags: Supreme Court Sadomasochism Decency Act
  • Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court's Ruling in Nitke Appeal Without Hearing Oral Arguments

    WASHINGTON, DC - The Supreme Court today denied an appeal by photographer Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) in the case of Nitke v. Gonzalez. The appeal challenged the constitutionality of the Communications Decency Act on the grounds that the obscenity provision of the CDA is overbroad. Last year, a three-judge panel in New York's Southern District had dismissed Nitke's lawsuit, ruling that there was "insufficient…






    Tags: Nightclub Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Decision in the Communications Decency Act (CDA)

      March 20, 2006 - Washington D.C. Today the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Federal District Court's decision in Barbara Nitke and NCSF v. Alberto Gonzales, the challenge to the Communications Decency Act, #01 CIV 11476 (RMB). The Supreme Court has affirmed the lower court's decision without hearing oral arguments, sending a clear signal that the court will not protect free speech rights when it comes to sexually explicit materials.…






    Tags: CDA Legal Supreme Court Nitke
  • Justices Pass on Internet Obscenity Case

    March 20,2006 | WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court turned back an appeal on Monday from a photographer who claimed a federal decency law violated her free-speech rights to post pictures of sadomasochistic sexual behavior on the Web. Justices affirmed a decision last year by a special three-judge federal panel upholding the 1996 law which makes it a crime to send obscenity over the Internet to children. The court could have…






    Tags: Legal Supreme Court
  • NCSF and Nitke vs. Gonzales Supreme Court Update

    March 3, 2006 - In documents filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Justice Department did not contest NCSF's assertion that NCSF's Communications Decency Act challenge is properly before the Supreme Court on direct appeal. That is a big step forward because that means both sides agree that the Supreme Court should rule on the merits of NCSF and Barbara Nitke's case, and not on any procedural grounds. The…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Communications Decency Act (CDA) Lawsuit

    July 26, 2005 - New York, NY - A three judge panel has made a decision in the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and acclaimed photographer Barbara Nitke's challenge against the Communications Decency Act (CDA) which criminalizes free speech on the Internet. According to the court, the plaintiffs presented "insufficient evidence" to support findings that the variation in community standards is substantial enough that protected speech is inhibited by the…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Expert Witness Reports Submitted in Nitke v. Ashcroft

    New York, December 18, 2003 - The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom has submitted expert witness reports for their landmark Communications Decency Act lawsuit, Nitke v. Ashcroft (Case No. 01 Civ. 11476). John Wirenius, attorney for plaintiffs NCSF and photographer Barbara Nitke, provided 31 expert witness reports and witnesses who will testify before the three-judge panel for the Southern District of New York.   The expert witness reports support the…






    Tags: Nitke
Nea vs. Findlay Case

Nea vs. Findlay Case

  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA
  • Case summary of Nea vs. Findlay

      Argued: March 31, 1998 Decided: June 25, 1998 Issue: Freedom of Speech -- Whether a law requiring the National Endowment for the Arts to consider "general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the American public" before awarding grants to artistic projects is impermissibly viewpoint-based and unconstitutionally vague. Vote: 8-1; No, the law does not violate the First Amendment. Facts: In 1990, Congress amended…






    Tags: Legal
CDA Media Reports

CDA Media Reports

Media reports covering the Communications Decency Act lawsuit launched by co-plaintiffs NCSF and Barbara Nitke.

  • NEWSBYTES - December 19, 2001

    Net Obscenity Provisions Revocation Sought NEWSBYTES By David McGuire http://www.NEWSBYTES.com December 19, 2001, Washington, DC -- A small civil liberties group has asked a federal judge in New York to revoke what remains of an Internet pornography law that was gutted by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. In a complaint filed in a New York City Federal Court [http://www.USCourts.gov ] last week, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom [https://ncsfreedom.org…






    Tags: Media News
  • San Francisco Bay Guardian - January 14, 2002

    Techsploitation By Annalee Newitz San Francisco Bay Guardian, January 14, 2002   HERE'S YET ANOTHER wacky fact you probably didn't know about the Communications Decency Act ole Bill Clinton signed into law way back in 1996: the good citizens of some small town in Arizona or southern California might have the power to send you to jail if they think the contents of your Web site are "obscene." The CDA…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • San Francisco Frontiers - January 23, 2002

    Communications Decency Act A Lingering Coup de Grace? By Tim Kingston   January 23, 2002   You may dimly recall the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which unsuccessfully attempted to define and proscribe "indecency" on the Internet. That law's legal core--its indecency provision--was immediately challenged and rapidly struck down as unconstitutional by free- and electronic-speech advocates. But, what many may not know is that another portion of the law, prohibiting…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Ynot News - January 2, 2002

    Can David Beat Goliath in the Battle of Obscenity? Part 2   By Judd Handler   Ynot News, January 2, 2002   Last week's editorial featured an interview with John Wirenius, lead counsel for the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and Barbara Nitke, an adult content photographer. Wirenius, on behalf of the NCSF and Nitke, filed a lawsuit on December 11 against Attorney General John Ashcroft seeking to overturn Internet…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Ynot News - December 20, 2001

    Can David Beat Goliath in the Battle of Obscenity? By Judd Handler   Ynot News, December 20, 2001   One would think it would take the giants of the industry to force the government to rethink existing, not-applicable-to-the-Internet obscenity laws. On the contrary, the little players may be the ones who are successful in getting the federal government and the Supreme Court to throw out irrelevant local community standards when…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Wired - December 12, 2001

    New Suit Targets Obscenity Law By Julia Scheeres Wired, December 12, 2001    A national organization that promotes sexual tolerance and an artist who photographs pictures of couples engaged in sadomasochism filed a lawsuit Tuesday seeking to overturn Internet obscenity laws. The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and photographer Barbara Nitke argue that the obscenity provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) is so broad that it violates free speech.…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Spectator Magazine - January 11, 2002

    STANDING UP TO BE COUNTED: BARBARA NITKE CHALLENGES JOHN ASHCROFT ON S/M AND INTERNET OBSCENITY By David Steinberg Spectator Magazine, January 11, 2002 "No matter how we're wired to express love, freedom is having the courage to be who we are." - Photographer/plaintiff Barbara Nitke On December 11, Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom brought suit in New York City's Federal District Court, seeking to have the…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Press - August 28, 2002

    What's Obscene in Podunk By John Strausbaugh New York Press, August 28, 2002   Barbara Nitke is a well-known and much-seen photographer in her field. She's president of the New York Camera Club and teaches a course in darkroom technique at SVA. A nice, neat, sweet individual, she's the very very last person in New York City you'd suspect of being a pornographer. Which she's not, not exactly. She's more…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Newsday - July 25 2005

    New York judges refuse to say Internet obscenity law is unconstitutional By LARRY NEUMEISTER Associated Press Writer, July 25, 2005, 7:58 PM EDT  NEW YORK -- A special three-judge federal panel on Monday refused to find unconstitutional a law making it a crime to send obscenity over the Internet to children. The Communications Decency Act of 1996 had been challenged by Barbara Nitke, a photographer who specializes in pictures of…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Daily News - July 15, 2002

    Fotog vs. Feds in Obscenity Law: Files suit to keep photos on Web by Veronica Vera New York Daily News, July 15, 2002 Photographer Barbara Nitke is used to being behind the lens, but if legal matters heat up, she may soon find the government focusing on her. Nitke is ready to step into the foreground as the chief plantiff in Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Nerve - December 11, 2001

    Nerve December 11, 2001 Photographer Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) filed a lawsuit today, claiming the Internet censorship provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The provision stipulates that "local community standards" will judge whether or not something is indecent. Yet attorney John Wirenius argues that "By allowing the most restrictive jurisdiction to define what speech can…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • CNN - December 20, 2001

    Lawsuit targets last scraps of Net-obscenity law By Sam Costello (IDG News) CNN, December 20, 2001 The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) and artist Barbara Nitke have filed a lawsuit challenging the remaining provisions of the Communications Decency Act, much of which was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. The act, or CDA, was passed in 1996 and was the first U.S. law designed to allow…






    Tags: CDA Media
  • Adult Video News - February, 2002

    NCSF Tackles "Community Standards" For The Web By Mark Kernes Adult Video News, February Issue Washington, DC The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom may not be a household name, even in the adult entertainment industry, but if their recently-filed lawsuit succeeds, they may go down in history as the first group to secure Americans' core constitutional speech rights.  NCSF is based in the nation's capital [~] in fact, only a…






    Tags: Media CDA News
  • ABC News - July 29, 2002

    Love or Obscenity? S/M Photographer Challenges Internet Decency Standards By Dean Schabner ABCnews.com, July 29, 2002 When Barbara Nitke wanted to put her photographs of loving couples on the Internet, she thought she should check into the laws first. That's because Nitke's recent photographs have been focused on how some couples express their love through sado-masochism. What Nitke found after reading up on Internet law and talking to lawyers was…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA

To bring a SM-related legal case to our attention,
Contact Us by emailing ncsfreedom@ncsfreedom.org
or calling
(410) 539-4824.