NCSF on Twitter   Subscribe to the NCSF RSS Feed   NCSF Blog

Media Update - December 1, 2008

1. An Interview With A Real Life NYU Dominatrix
2. Modern Sex: Power-Play 101
3. Bloggers Strike Back over KOMO's Sexphobic Smear
4. Behave! Toeing the legal line with a dominatrix
5. Rape or consent to sex?

National Coalition for Sexual Freedom -- Media  Update
December 1, 2008
www.ncsfreedom.org
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

NCSF Media Updates represent a sampling of recent stories printed in US
newspapers, magazines, and selected websites containing significant
mention of SM-leather-fetish, polyamory, or swing issues and topics.

These stories may be positive, negative, accurate, inaccurate - or
anywhere in between.

NCSF publishes the Updates to provide readers a comprehensive look at what
media outlets are writing about these topics. NCSF permits and encourages
readers to forward these Updates where appropriate.



An Interview With A Real Life NYU Dominatrix
by Jessica Roy
NYU Local (NY)
December 1, 2008

Some people spend hours at shitty work-study jobs pretending to look busy
while actually browsing Facebook, but one NYU student - who goes by the
name Mistress Ava - wears leather, humiliates people and gets paid for it.
Here's what she had to say about working as a dominatrix this summer.

JESSICA: What made you decide to work as a dominatrix?

AVA: I've always considered myself sexually open and so when, several
summers ago, I found myself living with a seemingly normal girl who worked
in this line of business, I was quick to become fascinated. I asked a lot
of questions and wasn't freaked out by any of it and thus my curiosity was
piqued. When I came back to NYC, I started making a few bucks here and
there off Craigslist and when classes ended and I was without a job, I
made the decision to apply to dungeons and make it official.

J: How easy was it to break into the business?

A: It was rather easy because I fit the role, but emotionally it was
incredibly taxing. First I had to be sure that, with every possible tool
of the trade suddenly at my whim, I was really comfortable with what could
possibly happen and then, when I started and I was actually okay with it,
I had to really look into myself and figure out what the hell was wrong
with me that I wasn't freaked out. Sure, I got a great job right away, but
it wasn't easy on my demeanor.

J: What kind of things did your job entail?

A: One of the first things I did was sit down and write out my bio and a
list of do's and dont's. According to my boss, I had a very open mind but
there were a lot of things I wouldn't do because I found them sexual. My
do's were all things that, though I might do in my private life, I knew I
could mentally disconnect from and find completely un-erotic. My dont's
were those things that were too close to actual sex for me not to see them
that way. For instance, anything involving penetration on a male. There is
no sex involved whatsoever but they can ask for strap-on play and that was
never on the menu with me. I also avoided any touching with my hands
because that felt a bit too "real sex" for me. A lot of girls are
genuinely into dominating a man and while I find it extremely fun, it is
not a sexual thing for me, which is why I couldn't stick with it.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/12/01/an-interview-with-a-real-life-nyu-dominatrix/
To respond, write to: comment at the bottom of the article


Modern Sex: Power-Play 101
by Kama Yama
The Bi-College News (Bryn Mawr and Haverford Colleges)
November 30, 2008

Have you ever wanted more? Wanted it harder, faster, and more aggressive?
Or did you want to be dominating, pushing and testing your lover's limits?
Or the other way around - wanting your partner to push your limits?

Power-play, also known as bondage, S/M, discipline, and role-playing,
among other names, can be extremely erotic. Sexual power-play can be mild
with light nibbles to extreme with hard bites. It can range from light
spanking to whipping. It can involve special equipment, or it can be done
with everyday items.

Power-play is not about pain, humiliation, degradation. Power-play is
always consensual and about trust. The dominant person does not want to
hurt or harm the submissive partner. The dominating partner trusts that
the submissive partner will communicate vocally or through expressions
what they are feeling.

Meanwhile, the submissive partner trusts that the dominant partner will
pay close attention to every detail of every expression, both vocally and
physically, and act in an appropriate manner. It's about communication and
lust. When aroused, what would normally be painful is pleasurable and
heightens the arousal level. Power-play can also be about empowerment and
doing something you would not ordinarily do, just to do it because you
want to try it.

The draw to power-play is often about stepping outside of one's daily role
and trying something different, and afterwards, not having any expectation
from your partner to be on top or to be on the bottom. It is not referred
to or brought into daily life, except in its own context. It is an escape
from reality. Some people follow a specific script or a predetermined
scenario, while others just go with the flow. No matter what the situation
is, it is always a good idea to have a safety word, phrase, or gesture
that signals the other partner to stop. Both partners must trust each
other to communicate any pain or discomfort during play.

Another point about power-play is that it does not necessarily involve
penetrative sex, even among heterosexual couples. It can be about either
partner's pleasure, or enjoying your partner's pleasure at what you do for
them in either a dominant or submissive position. Sometimes, the
dominating partner does everything possible to bring the submissive
partner to orgasm but then stops just before the orgasm, thus torturing
the submissive partner until they experience an explosive orgasm.

[continued]

To read this entre article, go to:
http://www.biconews.com/?p=12490
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or comment at the bottom of
the article


Bloggers Strike Back over KOMO's Sexphobic Smear
by Dominic Holden
The Stranger (Seattle, WA)
November 25, 2008

Until recently, a TV station could hype an erroneous news story about a
raunchy controversy, grab a few viewers at 11:00 p.m., and titillate them
with scandal - without any re-percussions from anybody. But lately, thanks
to the internet, the mainstream media is finding it harder to get away
with hack reporting.

Case in point: On November 17, KOMO 4 News ran a "Problem Solvers" segment
about the Center for Sex Positive Culture, a private sex club with 2,500
active members and a sister organization that teaches classes on having
better sex. News anchor Dan Lewis announced that Allena Gabosch, the
organization's executive director, "is seeking state and federal money
to
finance part of her sex organization."

Cut to KOMO's Marlee Ginter - the aforementioned "problem solver"
- taking
a tour of a windowless sex room. "I went to the club on one of its busiest
nights. I saw people naked, fondling, flogging," says Ginter. Then,
lilting her voice: "And even having sex."

But the problem for this "problem solver" was supposedly with the center's
funding. The organization's club is a 501(c)(7) nonprofit. Its tax
exemption, Ginter argued, is the equivalent of a government giveaway.

"She obviously found a way around the system," says a random woman in
Ginter's report - included, presumably, to demonstrate public outrage
about the center's finances.

However, Gabosch tells The Stranger, "We do not get money from the
government or from tax dollars" to fund the club or the organization's
sex-education wing. Indeed, IRS rules for (c)(7)s state that "a club
should be supported solely by membership fees, dues, and assessments,"
which are not tax deductible. And the sex-education wing of the
organization is a separately funded 501(c)(3), which also receives no
government funding.

In her report, unsurprisingly, Ginter never cites IRS rules. Instead, she
focuses on sexual taboos like bondage beds. In an apparent effort to prove
the state is failing to regulate the club, she interviews Tabitha
Blacksmith, a spokeswoman for the Charities Program of the Washington
Secretary of State, which only tracks nonprofits' contributions. Ginter
asks, "So you guys won't even determine... you're not a charity, you're
a
sex club." Blacksmith explained to Ginter that was outside the state's
purview.

"We don't have anything to do with [verifying] the (c)(3) or (c)(7),"
Blacksmith told The Stranger a week after the interview. "That's the IRS."

According to IRS rules, in order to qualify as a 501(c)(7), organizations
must maintain "personal contact, commingling, and face-to-face fellowship.
Members must share interests and have a common goal directed toward
pleasure, recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes."

By the IRS's standards, in other words, it practically has to be a sex
club.

But Ginter never brings up the tax rules governing groups like the center
- probably because citing what those rules actually say would undermine
the premise that there is a "problem."

The morning after KOMO's sexposC) aired, Stranger editorial director Dan
Savage launched an online assault on KOMO for its "sex-negative posturing"
and called on readers of Slog, The Stranger's blog, to e-mail complaints
to Ginter. The post was linked on numerous websites. Meanwhile, the video
of the segment went up on YouTube.

KOMO pulled the piece from its website the next day. But the controversy
was a dozen blog posts and thousands of YouTube views from being over.
"KOMO's Marlee Ginter Might Be Sucking Off Goats," two headlines readba
reference to Ginter's insinuation that the center "might be" getting
money
from the government. After all, it was just as true that Ginter "might be"
blowing goats as it was that the Center "might be" getting government
funding.

Within a day, that headline became the second Google result for Ginter's
name.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=787697
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or comment at the
bottom of the article


Behave! Toeing the legal line with a dominatrix
by Briam Alexander
MSNBC
November 24, 2008

Is it legal to hire a dominatrix as long as you don't actually have sex?
And what does it mean exactly when a woman happily partnered with a
longtime boyfriend suddenly starts longing for a lady lover? Sexploration
answers your most intimate queries. Got a question? E-mail us.

Q: Paying for sex is illegal in most of America, but what about paying for
fetish services? Can you legally hire a dominatrix or escort for any of
the countless things besides intercourse? Where is the line drawn?

A: If you have a hankering to strap on a codpiece and pay a woman for the
privilege of scrubbing her floors while she drips hot wax on your back,
the legal line is drawn at the border of the state or country in which you
live.

If you live in the United Kingdom, you can scrub away. Formula One
president Max Mosley may have been embarrassed when spy pictures taken of
his professional interactions with dominatrices popped up in a British
tabloid, but he wasnbt doing anything illegal by paying them for a stern
scolding and a little spank.

But if you live in Arizona, where the law defines paying for "flagellation
or torture by or on a person who is nude or clad in undergarments or in
revealing or bizarre costume or the condition of being fettered, bound or
otherwise physically restrained on the part of one so clothed" as illegal,
you can wind up in trouble.

In New York City, you probably wouldn't. But across the river in New
Jersey, you would. Get the picture? Even within states, laws can vary from
town to town, says Susan Wright, spokesperson for the National Coalition
for Sexual Freedom. "It is a big gray area", Wright explains. Often, she
says, "it depends on how the district attorney wants to interpret the
prostitution laws and how they define sexual conduct".

Some states are so specific they make sex read like an instruction manual
for assembling an IKEA bookcase. But some leave it vague. Generally, if
money is changing hands and somebody is inserting anything into anybody
else or touching genitals, it's probably against the law. Beyond that,
though, you have to research the laws where you live. You may wish to skip
the money and get to know people happy to participate free of charge by
attending a convention, or searching the Web. Many fetish enthusiasts I
have interviewed found each other on social networking sites.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27846842/
To respond, write to: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


Rape or consent to sex?
Prosecution: Man had history of bondage with 2 women
by Ed Palattella
The Erie Times-News
November 20, 2008

A Venango County man is claiming he and a woman were engaged in consensual
sex when he bound and gagged her with duct tape inside a Millcreek
Township motel room on March 6.


The Erie County District Attorney's Office is contending that the
defendant, Paul J. Sweetapple, 29, committed rape. And the prosecution --
at a trial that continues with jury deliberations today -- presented
evidence from two women to try to prove its case.

The first was the woman in the March incident, who was 27 at the time and
is the mother of Sweetapple's son.

The second was a woman who said Sweetapple engaged in similar behavior
with her in Franklin in 2004, when she said he tied her up with a
telephone cord during what the prosecution also characterized as forced
sex.

"It's a common plan," Assistant Erie County District Attorney Erin
Connelly told the jury of Sweetapple in her closing argument on Wednesday.
"He's going to get his sex however he can. He's into bondage.

"He did it once, and he did the same thing again."

Judge John Garhart, who is presiding, agreed with the prosecution and let
the jury hear about the other woman's experience with Sweetapple, which
she had documented in a protection-from-abuse complaint.

Connelly told the jury the testimony of both women supported physical
evidence that showed the woman in the March incident suffered from
reddened and damaged skin and genital bleeding shortly after Sweetapple
had sex with her at the El Patio Motel, 2950 W. Eighth St., where he was
living, on March 6.

Sweetapple, of Kennerdell, south of Franklin, took the stand in his own
defense and said the sex was consensual, and that he and the woman had
participated in bondage during sex before.

"It was our thing, ma'am," he told Connelly during cross-examination.

Sweetapple said he was paying child support to the woman -- she said he
was behind -- and that he would pay her extra money if she performed
sexual favors on him. He denied that woman's testimony that he bound the
woman, stuffed her underwear into her taped mouth and that he threatened
to put a plastic bag over the woman's head and kill her if she did not
have sex with him on March 6.

"The whole thing is not true, ma'am," Sweetapple testified.

The trial, which started Tuesday, was filled with jarring testimony of
what the prosecution said was Sweetapple's violent and extreme sexual
behavior.

[continued]

To read this entire article, go to:
http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081120/NEWS02/311209857
To respond, write to: the author at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or the
editors at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it



HOW TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Feedback letters are an effective way to convey a positive image of
alternate sexual practices such as SM, swinging, or polyamory. You can
help to correct negative social myths and misconceptions about these types
of practices. These letters help achieve the advocacy goals of the NCSF.

Generally, for a letter to be published, it's important to include your
name (or first initial, last name), city and daytime phone (for
verification only). For more information, see:
https://ncsfreedom.org/media/writelettertoeditor.htm

Please alert us to positive, negative or neutral stories about SM,
swinging and polyamory at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Comments to the editor of
this Update may be sent to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

###

A project of NCSF and ITCR: The Foundation of NCSF

SM Related Legal Research Resources

SM Related Legal Research Resources

  • Conducting SM Related Legal Research

    It is extremely important for members of NCSF constituent communities to understand the laws that may affect us.  Overview The law is interpreted – sometimes to our favor, and sometimes not. For example, while the NCSF firmly believes that consensual SM activity between adults is legal, there are those that have a differing opinion and will intentionally interpret the law in an unfavorable way. Therefore, it is extremely important for the SM-Leather-Fetish communities to have an understanding of the laws that may affect us. Knowing relevant laws will greatly assist our communities in safely organizing and maintaining SM-Leather-Fetish activities and functions. There are numerous laws, ordinances, and regulations at all levels of government - federal, state, regional, county and city. It's not easy to locate all of the laws that may affect us, but it's very important. You should make every attempt to thoroughly research your laws if your activities may come under the scrutiny of law enforcement or local authorities. In addition, NCSF recommends that thorough legal research should include consultation with a knowledgeable…






    Tags: Legal Legal Education
Jovanovic Case (Consent)

Jovanovic Case (Consent)

  • Affidavit of Susan Wright in Response to Affirmation in opposition to motion to file

    Affidavit of Susan Wright in Response to Affirmation in Opposition to Motion to File a Memorandum of Law Amicus Curiae   N.Y. Co. Ind. No 10938/96 Cal. No. 98-10474   1. I, Susan Wright, am the Executive Director of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) .   2. I write this affidavit in response to the DA's Brief in Opposition to the NCSF request to file an Amicus Curia…






    Tags: Legal Case Curiae
  • Affirmation of Michael Thomas Fois in response to opposition to motion to file

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96 -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X   AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS IN RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO MOTION TO FILE A MEMORANDUM OF LAW AMICUS CURIA Michael Thomas Fois, an attorney admitted to practice in front of this Court, affirms and…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Affirmation in opposition to motion to file

    AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FILE A -against- MEMORANDUM OF LAW   AMICUS CURIAE   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------------------ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Respondent, AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO FILE A -against- MEMORANDUM OF LAW AMICUS CURIAE OLIVER JOVANOVIC, N.Y. Co. Ind. No. 10938/96 Defendant-Appellant. Cal. No. 98-10474 ------------------------------------------------------   MARK DWYER, an attorney duly…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Memorandum of Law of Amicus Curiae, NCSF

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF AMICUS CURIAE  NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM  SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------XTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96-against- OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X  MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF AMICUS CURIAE  NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT   This brief is filed by the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom ("NCSF") as amicus curiae. Defendant Oliver Jovanovic…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Affirmation of Michael Thomas Fois

    AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/96   -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x       AFFIRMATION OF MICHAEL THOMAS FOIS     Michael Thomas Fois, an attorney admitted to practice in front of this Court, affirms and states under penalty of perjury,…






    Tags: Legal Case
  • Notice of motion requesting leave to file memorandum of Law as Amicus Curiae

    NOTICE OF MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS AMICUS CURIAE   SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Indictment No. Plaintiff-Respondent, 10938/ -against-   OLIVER JOVANOVIC, Defendant-Appellant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X   NOTICE OF MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS AMICUS CURIAE   Please take notice that, Upon the annexed Affirmation of Michael…






    Tags: Legal Case
Barbara Nitke Case (CDA)

Barbara Nitke Case (CDA)

  • CDA Expert Testimony in the Barbara Nitke Case

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X BARBARA NITKE, THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM, and THE NATIONAL COALITION FOR SEXUAL FREEDOM FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, -against- JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Defendants. 01 Civ. 11476 (RMB) PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------X   Plaintiffs Barbara Nitke ("Nitke") and…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA
  • Justices Reject Photographer's Appeal

    The Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal yesterday from a New York photographer who said that a federal decency law violated her First Amendment rights to post explicit pictures of sadomasochism and bondage on the Web, The Associated Press reported. The justices affirmed a decision by a special three-judge federal panel upholding the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which made it a crime to post obscene materials on the…






    Tags: Supreme Court Sadomasochism Decency Act
  • Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court's Ruling in Nitke Appeal Without Hearing Oral Arguments

    WASHINGTON, DC - The Supreme Court today denied an appeal by photographer Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) in the case of Nitke v. Gonzalez. The appeal challenged the constitutionality of the Communications Decency Act on the grounds that the obscenity provision of the CDA is overbroad. Last year, a three-judge panel in New York's Southern District had dismissed Nitke's lawsuit, ruling that there was "insufficient…






    Tags: Nightclub Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court Decision in the Communications Decency Act (CDA)

      March 20, 2006 - Washington D.C. Today the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Federal District Court's decision in Barbara Nitke and NCSF v. Alberto Gonzales, the challenge to the Communications Decency Act, #01 CIV 11476 (RMB). The Supreme Court has affirmed the lower court's decision without hearing oral arguments, sending a clear signal that the court will not protect free speech rights when it comes to sexually explicit materials.…






    Tags: CDA Legal Supreme Court Nitke
  • Justices Pass on Internet Obscenity Case

    March 20,2006 | WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court turned back an appeal on Monday from a photographer who claimed a federal decency law violated her free-speech rights to post pictures of sadomasochistic sexual behavior on the Web. Justices affirmed a decision last year by a special three-judge federal panel upholding the 1996 law which makes it a crime to send obscenity over the Internet to children. The court could have…






    Tags: Legal Supreme Court
  • NCSF and Nitke vs. Gonzales Supreme Court Update

    March 3, 2006 - In documents filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Justice Department did not contest NCSF's assertion that NCSF's Communications Decency Act challenge is properly before the Supreme Court on direct appeal. That is a big step forward because that means both sides agree that the Supreme Court should rule on the merits of NCSF and Barbara Nitke's case, and not on any procedural grounds. The…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Communications Decency Act (CDA) Lawsuit

    July 26, 2005 - New York, NY - A three judge panel has made a decision in the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and acclaimed photographer Barbara Nitke's challenge against the Communications Decency Act (CDA) which criminalizes free speech on the Internet. According to the court, the plaintiffs presented "insufficient evidence" to support findings that the variation in community standards is substantial enough that protected speech is inhibited by the…






    Tags: CDA Nitke
  • Expert Witness Reports Submitted in Nitke v. Ashcroft

    New York, December 18, 2003 - The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom has submitted expert witness reports for their landmark Communications Decency Act lawsuit, Nitke v. Ashcroft (Case No. 01 Civ. 11476). John Wirenius, attorney for plaintiffs NCSF and photographer Barbara Nitke, provided 31 expert witness reports and witnesses who will testify before the three-judge panel for the Southern District of New York.   The expert witness reports support the…






    Tags: Nitke
Nea vs. Findlay Case

Nea vs. Findlay Case

  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA
  • Case summary of Nea vs. Findlay

      Argued: March 31, 1998 Decided: June 25, 1998 Issue: Freedom of Speech -- Whether a law requiring the National Endowment for the Arts to consider "general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the American public" before awarding grants to artistic projects is impermissibly viewpoint-based and unconstitutionally vague. Vote: 8-1; No, the law does not violate the First Amendment. Facts: In 1990, Congress amended…






    Tags: Legal
CDA Media Reports

CDA Media Reports

Media reports covering the Communications Decency Act lawsuit launched by co-plaintiffs NCSF and Barbara Nitke.

  • NEWSBYTES - December 19, 2001

    Net Obscenity Provisions Revocation Sought NEWSBYTES By David McGuire http://www.NEWSBYTES.com December 19, 2001, Washington, DC -- A small civil liberties group has asked a federal judge in New York to revoke what remains of an Internet pornography law that was gutted by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. In a complaint filed in a New York City Federal Court [http://www.USCourts.gov ] last week, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom [https://ncsfreedom.org…






    Tags: Media News
  • San Francisco Bay Guardian - January 14, 2002

    Techsploitation By Annalee Newitz San Francisco Bay Guardian, January 14, 2002   HERE'S YET ANOTHER wacky fact you probably didn't know about the Communications Decency Act ole Bill Clinton signed into law way back in 1996: the good citizens of some small town in Arizona or southern California might have the power to send you to jail if they think the contents of your Web site are "obscene." The CDA…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • San Francisco Frontiers - January 23, 2002

    Communications Decency Act A Lingering Coup de Grace? By Tim Kingston   January 23, 2002   You may dimly recall the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which unsuccessfully attempted to define and proscribe "indecency" on the Internet. That law's legal core--its indecency provision--was immediately challenged and rapidly struck down as unconstitutional by free- and electronic-speech advocates. But, what many may not know is that another portion of the law, prohibiting…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Ynot News - January 2, 2002

    Can David Beat Goliath in the Battle of Obscenity? Part 2   By Judd Handler   Ynot News, January 2, 2002   Last week's editorial featured an interview with John Wirenius, lead counsel for the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and Barbara Nitke, an adult content photographer. Wirenius, on behalf of the NCSF and Nitke, filed a lawsuit on December 11 against Attorney General John Ashcroft seeking to overturn Internet…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Ynot News - December 20, 2001

    Can David Beat Goliath in the Battle of Obscenity? By Judd Handler   Ynot News, December 20, 2001   One would think it would take the giants of the industry to force the government to rethink existing, not-applicable-to-the-Internet obscenity laws. On the contrary, the little players may be the ones who are successful in getting the federal government and the Supreme Court to throw out irrelevant local community standards when…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Wired - December 12, 2001

    New Suit Targets Obscenity Law By Julia Scheeres Wired, December 12, 2001    A national organization that promotes sexual tolerance and an artist who photographs pictures of couples engaged in sadomasochism filed a lawsuit Tuesday seeking to overturn Internet obscenity laws. The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and photographer Barbara Nitke argue that the obscenity provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) is so broad that it violates free speech.…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Spectator Magazine - January 11, 2002

    STANDING UP TO BE COUNTED: BARBARA NITKE CHALLENGES JOHN ASHCROFT ON S/M AND INTERNET OBSCENITY By David Steinberg Spectator Magazine, January 11, 2002 "No matter how we're wired to express love, freedom is having the courage to be who we are." - Photographer/plaintiff Barbara Nitke On December 11, Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom brought suit in New York City's Federal District Court, seeking to have the…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Press - August 28, 2002

    What's Obscene in Podunk By John Strausbaugh New York Press, August 28, 2002   Barbara Nitke is a well-known and much-seen photographer in her field. She's president of the New York Camera Club and teaches a course in darkroom technique at SVA. A nice, neat, sweet individual, she's the very very last person in New York City you'd suspect of being a pornographer. Which she's not, not exactly. She's more…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Newsday - July 25 2005

    New York judges refuse to say Internet obscenity law is unconstitutional By LARRY NEUMEISTER Associated Press Writer, July 25, 2005, 7:58 PM EDT  NEW YORK -- A special three-judge federal panel on Monday refused to find unconstitutional a law making it a crime to send obscenity over the Internet to children. The Communications Decency Act of 1996 had been challenged by Barbara Nitke, a photographer who specializes in pictures of…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • New York Daily News - July 15, 2002

    Fotog vs. Feds in Obscenity Law: Files suit to keep photos on Web by Veronica Vera New York Daily News, July 15, 2002 Photographer Barbara Nitke is used to being behind the lens, but if legal matters heat up, she may soon find the government focusing on her. Nitke is ready to step into the foreground as the chief plantiff in Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Nerve - December 11, 2001

    Nerve December 11, 2001 Photographer Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) filed a lawsuit today, claiming the Internet censorship provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The provision stipulates that "local community standards" will judge whether or not something is indecent. Yet attorney John Wirenius argues that "By allowing the most restrictive jurisdiction to define what speech can…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • CNN - December 20, 2001

    Lawsuit targets last scraps of Net-obscenity law By Sam Costello (IDG News) CNN, December 20, 2001 The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) and artist Barbara Nitke have filed a lawsuit challenging the remaining provisions of the Communications Decency Act, much of which was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1997. The act, or CDA, was passed in 1996 and was the first U.S. law designed to allow…






    Tags: CDA Media
  • Adult Video News - February, 2002

    NCSF Tackles "Community Standards" For The Web By Mark Kernes Adult Video News, February Issue Washington, DC The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom may not be a household name, even in the adult entertainment industry, but if their recently-filed lawsuit succeeds, they may go down in history as the first group to secure Americans' core constitutional speech rights.  NCSF is based in the nation's capital [~] in fact, only a…






    Tags: Media CDA News
  • ABC News - July 29, 2002

    Love or Obscenity? S/M Photographer Challenges Internet Decency Standards By Dean Schabner ABCnews.com, July 29, 2002 When Barbara Nitke wanted to put her photographs of loving couples on the Internet, she thought she should check into the laws first. That's because Nitke's recent photographs have been focused on how some couples express their love through sado-masochism. What Nitke found after reading up on Internet law and talking to lawyers was…






    Tags: Media CDA
  • Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke and NCSF Reply (PDF)

    Govt Motion to Affirm Nitke 05-526 (pdf) (posted 3/2/06) NCSF Reply to Govt Motion to Affirm (doc) (posted 3/2/06)






    Tags: Civil_Rights CDA

To bring a SM-related legal case to our attention,
Contact Us by emailing ncsfreedom@ncsfreedom.org
or calling
(410) 539-4824.